GreenArmySwarm said:https://twitter.com/verbalcommits/status/1516509133138276361?s=21&t=duHUROtv3iVz07h0AOFhUA
Not unexpected with the number of other quality bigs DP is bringing in
Kadeezy said:GreenArmySwarm said:https://twitter.com/verbalcommits/status/1516509133138276361?s=21&t=duHUROtv3iVz07h0AOFhUA
Not unexpected with the number of other quality bigs DP is bringing in
Writing was on the wall, not a big loss. Would have had trouble seeing the floor with these new bigs. Komagum was so frustrating to watch at times, wish him the best.
movielover said:Kadeezy said:GreenArmySwarm said:https://twitter.com/verbalcommits/status/1516509133138276361?s=21&t=duHUROtv3iVz07h0AOFhUA
Not unexpected with the number of other quality bigs DP is bringing in
Writing was on the wall, not a big loss. Would have had trouble seeing the floor with these new bigs. Komagum was so frustrating to watch at times, wish him the best.
6 pts, 7 rebounds a game. Only one of the recruited Bigs is proven. (UCR player.)
SDHornet said:If coaches can bounce from program to program then I have no issue with players doing it too.
SDHornet said:Fair points, but I disagree...but more importantly so does SCOTUS. The argument of "amateurism" vs "professionalism" with respect to "student-athletes" has been settled.
https://www.cbssports.com/college-f...llowing-unlimited-benefits-tied-to-education/The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday unanimously ruled in favor of college athletes seeking unlimited benefits tied to education in a landmark case that enhances players' ability to earn compensation while simultaneously diminishing the NCAA's power. The Supreme Court ruled that the NCAA could not limit such benefits for athletes who play Division I basketball or football.
"The NCAA and its member colleges maintain important traditions that have become part of the fabric of America ... but those traditions alone cannot justify the NCAA's decision to build a massive money-raising enterprise on the backs of student athletes who are not fairly compensated," wrote Justice Brett Kavanaugh in his concurring opinion. "Nowhere else in America can businesses get away with agreeing not to pay their workers a fair market rate on the theory that their product is defined by not paying their workers a fair market rate. And under ordinary principles of antitrust law, it is not evident why college sports should be any different.
"The NCAA is not above the law."
The Supreme Court ruled 9-0 in favor of the appellees in Alston v. NCAA, who previously won a Northern District of California Circuit Court decision. The loss is the biggest legal defeat for the NCAA since the NCAA v. Board of Regents case in 1984 that allowed schools to monetize the rights to televised football games.